Down With Heavy Bottles!

Moving some bottles around in my cellar yesterday, I was struck by
how many I had that seemed extra heavy and would not fit in my wine
racks. I’m partly to blame for the latter hindrance, because when I had
the cellar installed four years ago I bought the cheapest racks
available. (Rather spend the money on the wine, I thought!) But the
weight of some of these really got me thinking, as I straightened out my
creaky back for the umpteenth time. Just how heavy are these things?

So I took some bottles upstairs and pulled out my kitchen scale. The
most striking finding was in comparing two bottles of California Pinot
Noir. Edna Valley Vineyard 2006 Paragon, a slim Burgundy-styled bottle that fit easily in my rack, weighed in at 2 pounds 11 ounces, or 1,230 grams. Sanford StHeavy_bottlesa. Rita Hills 2006, in contrast,
weighed 3 pounds 11 ounces, or 1,665 grams. As you can see in the
photo, the Sanford is a little taller and a little wider than the Edna
Valley. But much heavier.

An entire pound’s difference. Twelve pounds per case. About 600 – 840
extra pounds per pallet (depending on the number of cases in a pallet,
which seems to vary – perhaps larger bottles make for larger cases,
resulting in fewer cases per pallet?) How much extra transportation cost
(for both the empty and the full bottles) in getting this wine to
market? What effect not only on our pocketbooks but on greenhouse gas
emissions? Per bottle, perhaps negligible; but industry wide? I weighed
several different bottles of varying shapes – the Edna Valley and the
Sanford represented the extremes.

Wineries have made a big deal lately about “going green” and reducing
their “carbon footprints.” Many have installed solar power – it takes a
lot of electricity to keep those barrel rooms cool, after all. Others
tout sustainable, organic or biodynamic viticulture as ways they can be
good stewards of the land. All these steps are laudable. But more can be
done.

So I say to winemakers – put your egos in the wine itself, not the bottles that hold the wine. Use lighter bottles.

Jancis Robinson has been
railing against “bodybuilder bottles” for some time, and this year
launched a crusade to rally consumers against heavyweight bottles. Count
me on your team, Jancis!

This entry was posted in bottle size, California, Global Warming, writers. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Down With Heavy Bottles!

  1. I know exactly what you mean, Dave. You have to have a strong back and a
    weightlifters arms to lift some cases today. Instead of the 40 lbs per
    case for “regular” wine bottles, they are topping 50-60 lbs. Ouch!
    In addition, many of they bottles don’t fit into a “normal” wine rack
    anymore. What is a collector to do?

  2. Mike –
    I should think retailers would actually be leading the fight against
    these bottles – if only to protect their own backs – since they lift
    cases all the time! Larger bottles take up more shelf space as well,
    making displays more complicated.
    How do we get the retailers involved?

Join the Discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s